-
Introduction
-
01.Tour & Design
-
02.Sound Quality
-
03.Isolation
-
04.Comfort
-
05.Usability
-
06.Apple iPhone 3G S Headphones Comparison
-
07.Sennheiser MM 50 iP Comparison
-
08.Monster Turbines Comparison
-
09.Shure SE115 Comparison
-
10.Conclusion
-
11.Snippets
-
12.Ratings & Specs
-
13.Comments
Zagg Z-buds
Previous: Page 1
Tour & DesignNext: Page 3
IsolationSound Quality
Very low distortion. Frequency response is a bit extreme, tracking meanders.
Frequency Response (3.29)
The Z-buds definitely have a dynamic frequency response. The bass gets boosted quite a bit, much more so in the right channel than the left, oddly enough. We tried different positions but got the same results each time. At about the 2kHz mark, the channels get in sync and remain that way until after 10kHz.
The major issues we see here are the dramatic shifts in emphasis towards the high-end. From about 4kHz and up, emphasis shifts pretty rapidly. It decreases by about 30dB, then jumps 25dB before dropping another 30.
What does this mean? For starters, the headphones could sound boomy; the high bass response means that bass parts of music may sound overly exaggerated. It looks like vocals should be strong for the most part. Also, the lack of emphasis at 7kHz might make drums sound a bit weak.
Comparisons
See how the Zagg Z-buds compares:
Click here for more information on our frequency response test.
Distortion (8.20)
The Z-buds have very little distortion. There are some murmurs after 1kHz and towards the high-end, but they’re very minor.
Overall, a great performance here by the Z-buds.
Comparisons
See how the Zagg Z-buds compares:
Click here for more information on our frequency response test.
Tracking (7.46)
Here we can see the weird emphasis from the frequency response graph above made manifest. The lower you go, the stronger the right channel seems to be. It isn’t until after 1kHz that the two channels get on similar pages.
While the initial emphasis towards the right is certainly not ideal, We were happy to note there weren’t any glaring errors otherwise.
Comparisons
See how the Zagg Z-buds compares:
Click here for more information on our frequency response test.
Shop for the Zagg Z-buds
Latest News
& Reviews
-
03-Feb-2012
SMS Audio SYNC by 50 Over-ear Headphone Review
The SYNC by 50s aren’t inherently bad, they’re just terrible for $500. Read More...
-
01-Feb-2012
Denon AH-D5000 Over-ear Headphone Review
The Denon AH-D5000s are a great, if pricy, pickup. Read More...
Top Rated Headphones
-
TypeOver-EarWirelessNoActive Noise CancellingNo
-

$1,400.002Sennheiser HD 800
We finally got in the Sennheiser HD 800s. So what's our verdict? They're amazing. Read full 13-part review
$1,400.00TypeOver-EarWirelessNoActive Noise CancellingNo -

$67.503Sennheiser CX 680i
The Sennheiser CX 680i in-ear headphones are a decent set of lower-mid-range headphones with a remote & mic. They don't have the best quality and they're not quite as rugged as we would've expected from a set of in-ears aimed at the gym crew, but they're a great value at $100. Read full 13-part review
$67.50TypeIn-EarWirelessNoActive Noise CancellingNo -

$395.004Sennheiser IE 8i
With eight different sets of sleeves and optional ear-loops, it's not hard to see that Sennheiser really tries to make the listening experience a comfortable one. . Read full 13-part review
$395.00TypeIn-EarWirelessNoActive Noise CancellingNo -

$79.005Etymotic Research mc5
The Etymotic Research mc5 headphones are an entry level set of in-ears. At $80, the mc5s offer a disproportionately high audio quality for their price. Read full 13-part review
$79.00TypeIn-EarWirelessNoActive Noise CancellingNo
Features
-
Noise-Induced Hearing Loss and You
Our guide to enjoying headphones while preventing Noise-Induced Hearing Loss. A must-read for Headphone consumers. Read More...





(add your own)