Home > Blog
This isn't particularly new, but it's silly nonetheless. While we're not fans of headphone bans, we can understand why sometimes it's the best solution. For example: races. Now, anyone with access to Google and the wherewithall to search for "headphones running bad" can find a ton of runners' complaints. Apparently, people who wear headphones drunkenly swerve around race tracks, slowing down other runners. Also, wearing headphones can lead to runners not hearing important announcements, etc.

While we don't necessarily think this is the best reason for banning headphones -- do they ban deaf people, or the act of "drunkenly stumbling into other racers" itself, etc. -- we do understand how a ban is an easy solution. After all, it's their race, so they get to set the rules. I'm sure they also ban the use of shotguns or scooters, especially when both are used in tandem with headphones.

All this being said, is this seriously the best graphic they could come up with?


This was done by someone's graphic artist friend, who has never actually seen a logo or sign of any kind before. Maybe one time he or she overheard someone else's description, and the premise simply blew his/her graphic artist mind. This is a terrible logo for a few reasons.

1. Curvy words. Most road signs only consist of symbols, because simple pictures can describe, at a glance, a lot of information. Reading takes a lot more concentration, especially when it's upside-down. The words are just as a confusing border.

2. Way too busy. There are a lot of basic shapes in this picture, and they don't automatically congeal into a face, let alone the face of a headphone wearer. This text is all askew, there's a lot of overlapping lines, shapes, and colors... even the face in the middle looks astonished at this RGB-splashed mess. This logo is far more complicated than it needs to be.

3. Way too many colors. This compounds the business. Typical signs are one or two colors. Three, is pushing it, but allowed. Simple coloration makes it easy for people to pick actual signs out from nonessential ones, like advertisements. The colors are meaningless and only serve to dazzle viewers like the coloration of a poison dart frog. There is nothing about this random swath of colors that portrays a particular message, other than "What am I?"

4. Headphones aren't even the main focus. Really, this sign looks like MS Paint minimalism, like a Paul Frank monkey, or any "hip" internet ad. The only clear indicator of this sign's intent is partially upside-down, and is nowhere near as eye-catching as the Rorschach rainbow in the sign's center.

Our question is, if the only message you're trying to portray is "No headphones" -- if you'll notice, there's nothing that mentions jogging here -- why not just go for a really basic symbol inspired by road signage?

Example:


The cool part about this sign is you could actually put it on a race course, just in case you needed to remind people that they can't be trusted with their own gadgets. It'd probably make anti-headphone activists glow with self-righteous pride.



It's ok: no one is wearing headphones. You're safe.





Contact
Tips
Technical
Links
Top Reviews
Most Popular Tags
review
headphones
Headphones ATTACK!!
retrospective
Denon
in-ear
sennheiser
Sony
Dr. Dre
Beats
JVC
Monster
AH-C351
Apple
bose
etymotic
iPod
MDR-NC500D
Shure
wireless
Report an Error
Reviews   |   About   |   Advertising   |   Ethics   |   Sitemap
© Copyright 2008 HeadphoneInfo.com, all rights reserved. All trademarks and product names are property of their respective owners. HeadphoneInfo.com makes no guarantees regarding any of the advice offered on this web site or by its staff or users. All user comments and postings are not the responsibility of HeadphoneInfo.com.