Home > Reviews > Sennheiser > In-Ear

Sennheiser CX 95 Headphones Review - Value & Comparisons

Advertisement



Published on November 19, 2008
Comment on this



Value (7.50)
The Sennheiser CX 95s are a pretty good deal. They offer good audio quality and a pretty good wear experience for the better-than-average price of $120. They would have been a slightly better deal if they fit a bit better. Of course, however, the fit issue could be one that our ears and our ears alone suffer from. In terms of their audio quality and superior portability, we think they could have been sold for slightly more money.





Shure SE420 - The Shure SE420 is the current isolation champion. The Sennheiser CX 95 has better overall audio quality, with a particularly low distortion. Both have a split after a very short length of cord, which makes them both very portable (though the CX 95 has a much better case). The Shure SE420s also come with a bunch of different sleeves, but they also cost a lot more. Both are about as cost-efficient. really this one comes down to you and what you're personally looking for. If you want isolation, then the SE420s are better. If you're looking for better overall audio quality, then the CX 95s are a good choice. If it were up to us, we'd probably side with the Shure SE420s more often than not, but only because in-ears are typically for people on the go and people on the go benefit more from isolation than superb audio quality.



Sennheiser MM 50 iP - Sennheiser vs. Sennheiser, brother against brother, a match to truly match all matches. Actually this one is a bit anti-climactic: the MM 50 iPs win pretty handily. They do better and cost less. The only benefit the CX 95s have that the MM 50 iPs don't is the really short cord. This feature really works best for joggers and people on the move, but the ear buds just didn't stay in as well. The MM 50 iPs are also cheaper and have a mic and control button.







Etymotic Research 6isolator - The 6isolators are strong competitors. True to their name, they isolate very well. They also have great audio quality and are relatively cheap. The CX 95s, however, are a bit cheaper and offer slightly better overall audio quality. In this case we're really torn, because we value isolation over audio quality on in-ears. Try both, but we'd probably recommend the 6isolators over the CX 95s.

 
 



V-MODA Vibe Duo - The V-MODA Vibe Duos are slightly cheaper than the CX 95s, but we don't think they offer quite as much. The CX 95s trump them on audio quality, but the Vibe Duos look better overall and come with a handy mic and control button. This makes them great for use with cell phones or (select) media players. We think we're going to lean towards the CX 95s on this one, because the extra cash gets you a better value.





 
Apple iPod In-ear Headphones - The CX 95s one weak point is they dont' stay in your ears particularly well. The Apple iPod headphones take this flaw and magnify it by a factor of at least six (this hyperbole has not been verified with scientific testing). Really, although the iPod headphones are cheap, which wins over the budget buyers, the CX 95s offer a better deal if you can afford them, which will provide you with a much better quality set of headphones.

Report an Error
Reviews   |   About   |   Advertising   |   Ethics   |   Sitemap
© Copyright 2010 HeadphoneInfo.com, all rights reserved. All trademarks and product names are property of their respective owners. HeadphoneInfo.com makes no guarantees regarding any of the advice offered on this web site or by its staff or users. All user comments and postings are not the responsibility of HeadphoneInfo.com.