Home > Reviews > Sennheiser > In-Ear

Sennheiser CX 300-II Headphones Review - Monster Turbines Comparison

Advertisement



Published on March 19, 2009
Comment on this


Isolation Monster Turbines Comparison  
Monster Turbines• Turbines have more aesthetically-pleasing design.
• Similar frequency responses.
• CX 300-IIs have significantly less distortion.
• Similar tracking.
• Turbines have better isolation.
• Turbines fall out very, very easily, which is annoying.
• Turbines cost significantly more.
Return to Introduction. Usability Page 7 of 12 Shure SE420 Comparison Advance to the Sound Quality page.



Design


 Though the Turbines have a better aesthetic design, they do look a bit drab compared to the CX 300-IIs. The CX 300-IIs also have a more durable design. Compare the ear buds and plugs of the two headphones. The CX 300-II has better cord guards at the ear buds and a significantly better guard at the plug. Also, the plug is bent, which helps protect the internal wires better than a straight plug.

Aesthetics
CX 300-II
CX 300-II
Monster Turbines
Monster Turbines



Sound Quality


Both headphones have nearly the same frequency response.

Frequency Response
CX 300-II
CX 300-II
Monster Turbines
Monster Turbines

 

The Turbines have slightly more distortion present, but it's a negligible ammount.

Distortion
CX 300-II
CX 300-II
Monster Turbines
Monster Turbines

 

This isn't an obvious comparison, but the CX 300-IIs have a slightly better tracking. The graphs we use are normalized to enhance their readability, which sometimes eliminates a spike or two. Just trust us when we say the CX 300-IIs play on a slightly more even kiel. Practically speaking, the listener won't notice a difference between the two headphones.

Tracking
CX 300-II
CX 300-II
Monster Turbines
Monster Turbines



Isolation


 The Turbines had slightly better isolation than the CX 300-Iis. Note the CX 300-IIs' graph shoots up a bit abruptly just before 1000Hz, while the Turbines creep up more gradually. Also, note the relative sizes of the big humps in each graph: the Turbines block out more sound in this area overall.

Isolation
CX 300-II
CX 300-II
Monster Turbines
Monster Turbines



Comfort


 Both of these headphones are comfortable for in-ears.

Wear
CX 300-II
CX 300-II
Sennheiser CX 95
Monster Turbines



Verdict


The CX 300-IIs and Monster Turbines are comparable. They have about the same capabilities, although the CX 300-IIs are better in almost every quality. The CX 300-IIs also cost half what the Turbines cost. We're siding in favor of the Sennheisers.



Report an Error
Reviews   |   About   |   Advertising   |   Ethics   |   Sitemap
© Copyright 2010 HeadphoneInfo.com, all rights reserved. All trademarks and product names are property of their respective owners. HeadphoneInfo.com makes no guarantees regarding any of the advice offered on this web site or by its staff or users. All user comments and postings are not the responsibility of HeadphoneInfo.com.