Home > Reviews

Phiaton PS200 Headphones Review - Denon AH C351 Comparison

Advertisement



Published on April 02, 2009
Comment on this


Isolation Denon AH-C351 Comparison  
Denon AH-C351 • About the same durability and aesthetics.
• The AH-C351s have a bit of an issue with their mid-range frequencies that's relatively minor on the PS200s.
• Both headphones have about the same level of distortion.
• The AH-C351s have a slightly more even tracking.
• The AH-C351s more comfortable and fall out significantly less.
• The AH-C351s cost much, much less than the PS200s. 
Return to Introduction. Shure SE420 Comparison Page 10 of 12 Conclusion Advance to the Sound Quality page.



Design


The AH-C351s look simple but sharp and professional. The PS200s, on the other hand, look a bit less plain. In terms of durability, both headphones are about the same level of average. This one is too close for us to call: they're similar enough that it'd come down to personal preference, and whatever opinion you can muster just from looking at the two pictures below is more relevent than our own.

Aesthetics
PS200
PS200
Denon AH-C351
Denon AH-C351




Sound Quality


The PS200s have a better overall frequency response in this comparison, by quite a large margin. They have a valley in about the same spot as the AH-C351s, but the AH-C351s' valley is far deeper and steeper. The depth and angle of the slope indicate the severity of the shift. In the AH-C351s' case, an instrument in this area would sound a bit muted and if the instrument straddles this area, it will sound like it fades in and out.

Frequency Response
PS200
PS200
Denon AH-C351
Denon AH-C351



Both headphones performed about the same on this test, with the AH-C351s narrowly edging out the PS200s. There isn't enough difference between their distortion levels to influence anyone's purchase, however.

Distortion
PS200
PS200
Denon AH-C351
Denon AH-C351



The Denon AH-C351s have a slightly better tracking overall. There is a bit of a bump towards the 1kHz mark, but the PS200s feature two bumps of about the same magnitude and are slightly more off-kilter.

Tracking
PS200
PS200
Denon AH-C351
Denon AH-C351





Isolation


The PS200 was able to block out significantly more sound than the Denon AH-C351s.

Isolation
PS200
PS200
Denon AH-C351
Denon AH-C351




Comfort


The Denon AH-C351s were more comfortable overall and popped out far, far less.

Wear
PS200
PS200
Denon AH-C351
Denon AH-C351




Verdict


If we took price out of the equation, the PS200s are probably the better set of headphones. The AH-C351s have better tracking and are definitely better headphones to take to the gym, but the PS200s have a better overall audio quality. If you're not going to move around much, the PS200s clinch a clear victory. Once you account for price, however, the PS200s become a horrible value in comparison. Sure, they're better headphones overall, but their price is scaled on an entirely different magnitude than the AH-C351s. If money is no object and you're looking at only these two headphones, the PS200s are the better pick.



Report an Error
Reviews   |   About   |   Advertising   |   Ethics   |   Sitemap
© Copyright 2009 HeadphoneInfo.com, all rights reserved. All trademarks and product names are property of their respective owners. HeadphoneInfo.com makes no guarantees regarding any of the advice offered on this web site or by its staff or users. All user comments and postings are not the responsibility of HeadphoneInfo.com.