Home > Reviews > Bose > Over-Ear

Bose QuietComfort 3 Headphones Review - Performance

Advertisement



Published on April 04, 2008
Comment on this

Related Articles
Reviews: Bose QuietComfort 2 Headphones Review


The primary selling point of the Bose QuietComfort 3s is their ability to cancel outside noise, and they do an effective job of this, blocking a lot of outside noise. However, we found their audio quality isn't anything to write home about.

All tests are carried out using a high-end electroacoustic audio analysis system consisting of a Head and Torso Simulator (HATS) and a professional audio analysis program called SoundCheck, produced by Listen, inc. The HATS simulates the human head and ears, and has two microphones in the ears that respond to sounds in the same way your ears do. The Soundcheck system produces a series of test signals and captures the output from the headphones using these microphones, allowing us to do very precise, scientific testing of headphones. For more information on how we do our headphone quality audio testing see this article.

Frequency Response (1.66)
One of the fundamental aspects of performance in headphones is frequency response; how good a job do the headphones do taking the electrical signal the music player produces and turning this into sound? Our testing system analyzes the frequency response by sending a frequency sweep to the headphones that goes from the very low (about 80Hz, which sounds like an earthquake) to the very high (10kHz, which is a high-pitched squeak). How well the headphones reproduce these frequencies is shown on the graph below: low frequencies are on the left, high on the right. The green line is for the left channel, the red is for the right.

 


The dotted lines indicate the limits we look for; if anything was to veer too widely above or below these limits, that would indicate the headphones are either overly emphasizing or suppressing those frequencies, which makes the music sound unnatural. The Bose QuietComfort 3 headphones have some problems here; the response curve gets somewhat erratic at the higher end, with sizeable peaks and troughs. This may be a problem for the audio quality; it means two nearby frequencies are reproduced at quite different levels, which wouldn't sound the way it should. We like smooth response curves, but the QuietComfort 3 headphones produces curves that are anything but smooth. However, this erratic response is only a problem at higher frequencies; the curve for the important low frequencies is reasonably smooth, so the big bass frequencies should be clearly reproduced.

It is possible these peaks and troughs could be caused by the active noise cancellation the QuietComfort 3 headphones use; this is generating sounds to cancel noise, so it could be interfering with the music. Since the headphones won't work without noise cancellation turned on, we weren't able to test this theory. 


Distortion (10.00)
Distortion is where the headphones don't produce the sound you hope for; the waveform of the sound gets clipped or otherwise mangled by some problem in the drivers that produce the sound. The QuietComfort 3 headphones don't show a huge amout of distortion, but there is some evidence of minor distortion there.

Our system examines the distortion headphones introduce by playing back a frequency sweep of  sounds across the frequency range at the typical listening level of around 78 dBSPL and examining the results for any differences from the original waveform. The graph below shows what's called the Total Harmonic Distortion (THD), which is the amount of distortion (as a percentage) of the basic frequency, as well as the higher frequency harmonics that provide the tone and texture of a sound; ideally, these should be reproduced accurately. The graph starts with low, bassy frequencies at the left and goes up to high frequencies at the right. Again, the green line is the left channel and the red line is the right.


Distortion is where the headphones don't produce the sound you hope for - the waveform of the sound gets clipped or otherwise mangled by some sort of a problem in the drivers that produce the sound. The QuietComfort 3 headphones don't show a huge amount of distortion, but there is some evidence of minor distortion at the lower frequencies. But that is a minor problem. On the whole, they have no problem with distortion.

Tracking (2.49)
Headphones have one channel for each ear, so it is important that the two sides produce the same sound. That's what we look at in this test - how well balanced the two sides of the headphones are. The QuietComfort 3s had some minor issues here because the balance of sound shifts to a slight degree from side to side.

Our test system produces the graph below, which shows the tracking across the frequency range of 100 to 20kHz. If the line is at 0 percent, that indicates the sound at that frequency is identical in both channels. If it goes above that line, the left channel is stronger, and if it goes below, the right channel is putting out more. The QuietComfort 3s are all over the place at higher frequencies, with the tracking varying wildly from frequency to frequency.


Maximum Usable Volume (9.65)
The distortion test we do above is run at a pretty normal listening level of 78 dBSPL, but some people like it loud, so we also test how high we can crank up the volume. We test this by how high we can take the volume until the distortion in the sound reaches 3 percent, where it becomes audible and annoying. The QuietComfort 3s managed to reach an ear-splitting118.5 dBSPL before our testing system called a halt to the test; that's loud enough that even the most avid loud music fans can enjoy distortion-free tunes. Unless they are into grunge music or heavy metal, where the distortion is built in. And remember, our testing system has replaceable ears - yours are not. If you crank the volume up that high, you're likely to permanently damage them. 


Isolation (6.28)
Isolation is one of the big selling points of the QuietComfort 3 headphones; Bose claims its active noise-cancelling circuitry identifies and cancels noise, and our tests show these headphones do a very good job of this.

The graph below shows the frequency range of 20Hz to 20kHz, with the line indicating how much sound is blocked at that frequency; higher is better. The green line is for with the headphones in place, but with the sound-cancelling turned off. The blue line is for the same test, but with the noise-cancelling enabled. In both cases, the higher the line, the more noise the headphones block.



As you can see, the active noise cancelling does a much more effective job, especially at lower frequencies. With these low frequency noises (such as you would get inside an airplane in flight), the headphones turned off don't block anything, and low frequency rumbles go straight through them. But with the noise cancelling turned on, a significant amount of these noises are blocked. Over the entire frequency range, they block an average of about 15 dB of noise. But like the QuietComfort 2s, there is an odd spot in the middle where the headphones block more sound with the noise cancellation turned off than with it turned on, possibly because of a quirk of the noise cancelling system.

It is also interesting to compare the effectiveness of these against another type of headphones, the in-ear ear canal ones like the Etymotic ER6i and Shure SE210. Both blocked more overall noise than the QuietComfort 3 headphones because they effectively act as earplugs, blocking the ear canal with an average reduction of about 30dB. They do a more effective job than both the QuietComfort 3 and their sibling QuietComfort 2s, but many people don't like putting things in their ears. For these people, the QuietComfort 3 headphones do an effective job blocking unwanted sounds.


Leakage (4.01)
The QuietComfort 3 headphones also do only a middling job protecting the outside world from you; in our tests, we found some sound escapes from the headphones that might bother someone sitting close to you; in a quiet room you can hear the music from several feet away. That's because the on-ear design does not form a perfect seal, so there is always a gap that lets some noise through.

Report an Error
Reviews   |   About   |   Advertising   |   Ethics   |   Sitemap
© Copyright 2008 HeadphoneInfo.com, all rights reserved. All trademarks and product names are property of their respective owners. HeadphoneInfo.com makes no guarantees regarding any of the advice offered on this web site or by its staff or users. All user comments and postings are not the responsibility of HeadphoneInfo.com.