-
Introduction
-
01.Tour & Design
-
02.Sound Quality
-
03.Isolation
-
04.Comfort
-
05.Usability
-
06.Audio-Technica ATH-ESW9 Comparison
-
07.Beyerdynamic DT 990 PRO Comparison
-
08.Grado Labs SR60 Comparison
-
09.Sennheiser HD 555 Comparison
-
10.Conclusion
-
11.Snippets
-
12.Ratings & Specs
-
13.Comments
Audio-Technica ATH-W5000
Previous: Page 1
Tour & DesignNext: Page 3
IsolationSound Quality
Low distortion. Issues with the high end.
Frequency Response (2.69)
The ATH-W5000s had a bit of an issue with high-frequency sounds, which we thought was a bit odd since our initial impression was they focused too much on mid-to-high-end frequencies. We ran this test multiple times, but that downward spike towards 7kHz was always present. Other than this spike, the ATH-W5000s did a good job. We’re guessing that hump in the middle is indicative of our initial impression, and bass isn’t bumped up as much as you’d see on typical headphones.
Overall, it’s a bit wonky of a frequency response, especially for a set of high-end headphones. We ran this test multiple times, and found the issues towards the high end varied a bit in their severity, but were constant in their appearance.
One theory we came up with is that a lot of this de-emphasis comes from sound leaking out of the headphones, due to the poor seal. If that is the case, then the ATH-W5000s would actually have done very well on this test.
Comparisons
See how the Audio-Technica ATH-W5000 compares:
Click here for more information on our frequency response test.
Distortion (6.37)
What we found on the ATH-W5000s was very little distortion, except for a bit in that area of mysterious weirdness towards 7kHz. In general, the W5000s did well on this test.
Comparisons
See how the Audio-Technica ATH-W5000 compares:
Click here for more information on our frequency response test.
Tracking (4.41)
The ATH-W5000s had some issues with tracking, towards the lower end and towards the high end (the aforementioned enigmatic spot of ‘seriously, what’s going on here, W5000s?’). That spot towards the high end is where they lost a majority of their points.
If you have a head that’s perfectly shaped to accept the W5000s, or if you mod them in some way to get a good fit, they’ll probably suffer less from the issues detailed in this section.
Comparisons
See how the Audio-Technica ATH-W5000 compares:
Click here for more information on our frequency response test.
Shop for the Audio-Technica ATH-W5000
Latest News
& Reviews
-
03-Feb-2012
SMS Audio SYNC by 50 Over-ear Headphone Review
The SYNC by 50s aren’t inherently bad, they’re just terrible for $500. Read More...
-
01-Feb-2012
Denon AH-D5000 Over-ear Headphone Review
The Denon AH-D5000s are a great, if pricy, pickup. Read More...
Top Rated Headphones
-
TypeOver-EarWirelessNoActive Noise CancellingNo
-

$1,400.002Sennheiser HD 800
We finally got in the Sennheiser HD 800s. So what's our verdict? They're amazing. Read full 13-part review
$1,400.00TypeOver-EarWirelessNoActive Noise CancellingNo -

$65.633Sennheiser CX 680i
The Sennheiser CX 680i in-ear headphones are a decent set of lower-mid-range headphones with a remote & mic. They don't have the best quality and they're not quite as rugged as we would've expected from a set of in-ears aimed at the gym crew, but they're a great value at $100. Read full 13-part review
$65.63TypeIn-EarWirelessNoActive Noise CancellingNo -

$395.004Sennheiser IE 8i
With eight different sets of sleeves and optional ear-loops, it's not hard to see that Sennheiser really tries to make the listening experience a comfortable one. . Read full 13-part review
$395.00TypeIn-EarWirelessNoActive Noise CancellingNo -

$79.005Etymotic Research mc5
The Etymotic Research mc5 headphones are an entry level set of in-ears. At $80, the mc5s offer a disproportionately high audio quality for their price. Read full 13-part review
$79.00TypeIn-EarWirelessNoActive Noise CancellingNo
Features
-
Noise-Induced Hearing Loss and You
Our guide to enjoying headphones while preventing Noise-Induced Hearing Loss. A must-read for Headphone consumers. Read More...




(add your own)