-
Introduction
-
01.Tour & Design
-
02.Sound Quality
-
03.Isolation
-
04.Comfort
-
05.Usability
-
06.Apple In ear Headphones with Remote and Mic Comparison
-
07.Sennheiser MM 50 iP Comparison
-
08.Denon AH-C351 Comparison
-
09.Shure SE115 Comparison
-
10.Conclusion
-
11.Snippets
-
12.Ratings & Specs
-
13.Comments
Apple iPhone 3G S Headphones
Previous: Page 1
Tour & DesignNext: Page 3
IsolationSound Quality
The frequency response and tracking results weren’t bad. The distortion test results were very, very bad.
Frequency Response (6.69)
The iPhone 3G S headphones have a really decent frequency response. They aren’t perfect, but they did a good job of falling within our limits. The bass trails off towards the low end, which might not be desirable. There’s also a bit of a fall off after the 7kHz line, followed by a bit of a spike at 10kHz.
In general, the response was even. We had no real complaints here.
Comparisons
See how the Apple iPhone 3G S Headphones compares:
Click here for more information on our frequency response test.
Distortion (0.69)
As you may or may not have guessed by the score or the graph to the right, the iPhone 3G S’ headphones aren’t the best in terms of distortion. In fact, they’re pretty bad.
The reason for this low-end distortion is likely due to the headphones’ design. Since they sit outside the ear canal, there’s no seal between the headphones and your ear. Therefore, instead of pumping bass directly into your ear, it shotguns it in the right direction. Bassy sounds are hard for in-ears create, since they involve moving a lot of air and in-ears don’t have a lot of room for large, fancy drivers.
We also noticed there was a lot of noise when we hooked it up to an amp.
Comparisons
See how the Apple iPhone 3G S Headphones compares:
Click here for more information on our frequency response test.
Tracking (9.52)
Once we finally got the ear buds to stay in place, we found the headphones’ tracking was actually really good.
You may notice that the headphones seem to be heavy in the right channel. This is true, but it’s by a barely audible amount. The things people tend to notice are sudden shifts in volume from one channel to another.
Comparisons
See how the Apple iPhone 3G S Headphones compares:
Click here for more information on our frequency response test.
Latest News
& Reviews
-
03-Feb-2012
SMS Audio SYNC by 50 Over-ear Headphone Review
The SYNC by 50s aren’t inherently bad, they’re just terrible for $500. Read More...
-
01-Feb-2012
Denon AH-D5000 Over-ear Headphone Review
The Denon AH-D5000s are a great, if pricy, pickup. Read More...
Top Rated Headphones
-
TypeOver-EarWirelessNoActive Noise CancellingNo
-

$1,400.002Sennheiser HD 800
We finally got in the Sennheiser HD 800s. So what's our verdict? They're amazing. Read full 13-part review
$1,400.00TypeOver-EarWirelessNoActive Noise CancellingNo -

$72.273Sennheiser CX 680i
The Sennheiser CX 680i in-ear headphones are a decent set of lower-mid-range headphones with a remote & mic. They don't have the best quality and they're not quite as rugged as we would've expected from a set of in-ears aimed at the gym crew, but they're a great value at $100. Read full 13-part review
$72.27TypeIn-EarWirelessNoActive Noise CancellingNo -

$395.004Sennheiser IE 8i
With eight different sets of sleeves and optional ear-loops, it's not hard to see that Sennheiser really tries to make the listening experience a comfortable one. . Read full 13-part review
$395.00TypeIn-EarWirelessNoActive Noise CancellingNo -

$79.005Etymotic Research mc5
The Etymotic Research mc5 headphones are an entry level set of in-ears. At $80, the mc5s offer a disproportionately high audio quality for their price. Read full 13-part review
$79.00TypeIn-EarWirelessNoActive Noise CancellingNo
Features
-
Noise-Induced Hearing Loss and You
Our guide to enjoying headphones while preventing Noise-Induced Hearing Loss. A must-read for Headphone consumers. Read More...





(add your own)