-
Introduction
-
01.Tour & Design
-
02.Sound Quality
-
03.Isolation
-
04.Comfort
-
05.Usability
-
06.Apple In ear Headphones with Remote and Mic Comparison
-
07.Sennheiser MM 50 iP Comparison
-
08.Denon AH-C351 Comparison
-
09.Shure SE115 Comparison
-
10.Conclusion
-
11.Snippets
-
12.Ratings & Specs
-
13.Comments
Apple iPhone 3G S Headphones
Previous: Page 7
Sennheiser MM 50 iP ComparisonNext: Page 9
Shure SE115 ComparisonDenon AH-C351 Comparison
Design
Again, in-ears don’t have a lot of surface area to dedicate to aesthetics. The difference between these two headphones will likely be their color.
In terms of durability, the AH-C351s have the upper hand. They have better cord guards, and are protected by sleeves.
![]() |
![]() |
| Apple iPhone 3G S Headphones | Denon AH-C351 |
Frequency Response
The Apple headphones have a more even frequency response. The AH-C351s have better bass, drop out between 2kHz and 7kHz, then become erratic up until they peter out.
![]() |
![]() |
| Apple iPhone 3G S Headphones | Denon AH-C351 |
Distortion
Though the AH-C351s has some minor distortion issues, they pale in comparison to the iPhone 3G S’s results.
![]() |
![]() |
| Apple iPhone 3G S Headphones | Denon AH-C351 |
Tracking
The iPhone 3G S’s tracking results were a bit better than the AH-C351s’, though both headphones did well on this test.
![]() |
![]() |
| Apple iPhone 3G S Headphones | Denon AH-C351 |
Isolation
The AH-C351s had average isolation for a set of in-ear headphones. The iPhone 3G S had average isolation for a set of totally uncovered ears.
![]() |
![]() |
| Apple iPhone 3G S Headphones | Denon AH-C351 |
Comfort
The Denon AH-C351s have very thin, soft sleeves. They’re pretty comfortable. A lot of people will likely think the iPhone 3G S headphones are comfortable as well, but for anyone used to a set of canal in-ears will be constantly irked by the sensation that their headphones are falling out.
| Wear | |
|---|---|
![]() |
![]() |
| Apple iPhone 3G S Headphones | Denon AH-C351 |
Verdict
The Denon AH-C351s might not be the best upgrade for the iPhone 3G S headphones. For starters, it doesn’t have a remote, mic, or volume controls. The iPhone headphones offer similar audio quality, but have inferior isolation. If you take a train or bus to work in the morning, the AH-C351s might be a good upgrade, but even then you’ll be sacrificing a few extras.
Latest News
& Reviews
-
03-Feb-2012
SMS Audio SYNC by 50 Over-ear Headphone Review
The SYNC by 50s aren’t inherently bad, they’re just terrible for $500. Read More...
-
01-Feb-2012
Denon AH-D5000 Over-ear Headphone Review
The Denon AH-D5000s are a great, if pricy, pickup. Read More...
Top Rated Headphones
-
TypeOver-EarWirelessNoActive Noise CancellingNo
-

$1,400.002Sennheiser HD 800
We finally got in the Sennheiser HD 800s. So what's our verdict? They're amazing. Read full 13-part review
$1,400.00TypeOver-EarWirelessNoActive Noise CancellingNo -

$67.503Sennheiser CX 680i
The Sennheiser CX 680i in-ear headphones are a decent set of lower-mid-range headphones with a remote & mic. They don't have the best quality and they're not quite as rugged as we would've expected from a set of in-ears aimed at the gym crew, but they're a great value at $100. Read full 13-part review
$67.50TypeIn-EarWirelessNoActive Noise CancellingNo -

$395.004Sennheiser IE 8i
With eight different sets of sleeves and optional ear-loops, it's not hard to see that Sennheiser really tries to make the listening experience a comfortable one. . Read full 13-part review
$395.00TypeIn-EarWirelessNoActive Noise CancellingNo -

$79.005Etymotic Research mc5
The Etymotic Research mc5 headphones are an entry level set of in-ears. At $80, the mc5s offer a disproportionately high audio quality for their price. Read full 13-part review
$79.00TypeIn-EarWirelessNoActive Noise CancellingNo
Features
-
Noise-Induced Hearing Loss and You
Our guide to enjoying headphones while preventing Noise-Induced Hearing Loss. A must-read for Headphone consumers. Read More...













(add your own)